Screener
EMBX vs CLOI
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs VanEck CLO ETF
Key differences
- CLOI costs 0.40% less per year.
- CLOI is significantly larger than EMBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBX follows a index tracking strategy; CLOI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBX | CLOI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $244M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.51% | 5.44% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.86% | 1.21% |
| Max drawdown | -37.55% | -3.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBX and CLOI
Explore further