Screener
CLOB vs VRIG
Vaneck Aa-bb Clo Etf vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.15% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than CLOB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOB | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.55% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -5.54% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOB and VRIG
Explore further