Screener
VRIG vs PFIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.08% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; PFIG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $113M |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.90 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 3.10% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and PFIG
Explore further