Screener
CLOI vs EMBX
VanEck CLO ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- CLOI costs 0.40% less per year.
- CLOI is significantly larger than EMBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOI follows a active selection strategy; EMBX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOI | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $244M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 5.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.21% | 5.86% |
| Max drawdown | -3.36% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOI and EMBX
Explore further