Screener
EMBX vs CLOB
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Vaneck Aa-bb Clo Etf
Key differences
- CLOB costs 0.31% less per year.
- EMBX follows a index tracking strategy; CLOB uses active selection.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBX | CLOB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $244M | $167M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.51% | 6.55% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.86% | 3.03% |
| Max drawdown | -37.55% | -5.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBX and CLOB
Explore further