Screener
CLOI vs LFEQ
VanEck CLO ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- CLOI costs 0.22% less per year.
- CLOI is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOI is classified as fixed income, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CLOI follows a active selection strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOI | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $29M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.21% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -3.36% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOI and LFEQ
Explore further