Screener
LFEQ vs CLOB
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Vaneck Aa-bb Clo Etf
Key differences
- CLOB costs 0.13% less per year.
- CLOB is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while CLOB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; CLOB uses active selection.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | CLOB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $167M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 6.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 3.03% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -5.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and CLOB
Explore further