Screener
CNQQ vs TRFM
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs AAM Transformers ETF
Key differences
Both CNQQ and TRFM are equity ETFs. CNQQ charges 0.75% a year and TRFM 0.49%. The main difference: CNQQ covers the Asia-Pacific region; TRFM covers North America.
- CNQQ covers the Asia-Pacific region; TRFM covers North America.
- TRFM costs 0.26% less per year.
- TRFM is much larger than CNQQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNQQ | TRFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $213M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +29.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.37% |
| Max drawdown | -17.82% | -28.40% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.