Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CNQQ vs FRWD

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF

CNQQ

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$26M

FRWD

Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$223M

Key differences

Both CNQQ and FRWD are equity ETFs. CNQQ charges 0.75% a year and FRWD 0.65%. The main difference: CNQQ follows a index tracking strategy; FRWD uses active selection.

  • CNQQ follows a index tracking strategy; FRWD uses active selection.
  • FRWD costs 0.10% less per year.
  • FRWD is much larger than CNQQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

CNQQFRWD
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.65%
Fund size (AUM)$26M$223M
Since20252026
Dividend yield
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacific
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-17.82%-18.49%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to CNQQ and FRWD