Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CNYA vs EIS

iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI Israel ETF

CNYA

iShares MSCI China A ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$242M

EIS

iShares MSCI Israel ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$1.0B

Key differences

Both CNYA and EIS are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and EIS 0.59%. The main difference: EIS is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • EIS is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, EIS has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EIS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

CNYAEIS
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$242M$1.0B
Since20162008
Dividend yield1.76%1.14%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+31.7%+47.1%
CAGR 3Y+10.3%+35.3%
CAGR 5Y-1.9%+14.2%
Sharpe 3Y0.381.35
Volatility 1Y17.67%22.97%
Max drawdown-49.48%-41.88%

Similar to CNYA and EIS