Screener
CNYA vs MCHI
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- MCHI is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MCHI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $238M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.80% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.5% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.18% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CNYA and MCHI
Explore further