Screener
CNYA vs EWH
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and EWH are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and EWH 0.50%. The main difference: CNYA covers emerging markets; EWH covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- CNYA covers emerging markets; EWH covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWH costs 0.10% less per year.
- EWH is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | EWH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 4.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | -1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 16.60% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -42.71% |
Similar to CNYA and EWH
Explore further