Screener
COPA vs GBUG
Themes Copper Miners ETF vs Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPA costs 0.55% less per year.
- GBUG is significantly larger than COPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- COPA follows a index tracking strategy; GBUG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPA | GBUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $164M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +116.4% | +74.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.64% | 47.45% |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPA and GBUG
Explore further