Screener
GBUG vs AUMI
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs Themes Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- AUMI costs 0.55% less per year.
- GBUG is significantly larger than AUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBUG follows a active selection strategy; AUMI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBUG | AUMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $164M | $30M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.3% | +59.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.45% | 48.12% |
| Max drawdown | -32.10% | -31.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBUG and AUMI
Explore further