Screener
COPA vs INTL
Themes Copper Miners ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- COPA costs 0.49% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than COPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- COPA is classified as equity, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- COPA follows a index tracking strategy; INTL uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPA | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $222M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +116.4% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.64% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPA and INTL
Explore further