Screener
COPA vs TMAT
Themes Copper Miners ETF vs Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Key differences
- COPA costs 0.47% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than COPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- COPA is classified as equity, while TMAT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- COPA follows a index tracking strategy; TMAT uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPA | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $211M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +116.4% | +41.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.64% | 24.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | -58.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPA and TMAT
Explore further