Screener
COPA vs SLVP
Themes Copper Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Key differences
- SLVP is significantly larger than COPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLVP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPA | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $945M |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +116.5% | +129.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +50.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.48% | 52.87% |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | -62.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPA and SLVP
Explore further