Screener
SLVP vs ICOP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Key differences
- SLVP costs 0.08% less per year.
- SLVP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $429M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +129.6% | +94.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +50.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.87% | 36.85% |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -38.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and ICOP
Explore further