Screener
COPJ vs METL
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPJ costs 0.24% less per year.
- COPJ follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPJ | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $95M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 11.05% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +43.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.67% | — |
| Max drawdown | -32.28% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPJ and METL
Explore further