Screener
METL vs COPP
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Sprott Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPP costs 0.33% less per year.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; COPP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $269M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +99.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 42.29% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -44.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and COPP
Explore further