Screener
COPP vs URNM
Sprott Copper Miners ETF vs Sprott Uranium Miners Etf
Key differences
- COPP costs 0.09% less per year.
- URNM is significantly larger than COPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URNM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPP | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $269M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.5% | +52.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.29% | 51.03% |
| Max drawdown | -44.37% | -50.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPP and URNM
Explore further