Screener
COPP vs METL
Sprott Copper Miners ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPP costs 0.33% less per year.
- COPP follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPP | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $269M | $95M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.29% | — |
| Max drawdown | -44.37% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPP and METL
Explore further