Screener
COPX vs URA
Global X Copper Miners ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPX | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.4B | $7.8B |
| Since | 2010 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.43% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +114.0% | +65.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.6% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.9% | +23.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.00% | 49.70% |
| Max drawdown | -65.41% | -61.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPX and URA
Explore further