Screener
URA vs SIL
Global X Uranium ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, SIL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $5.3B |
| Since | 2010 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | +110.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | +48.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | 49.93% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -63.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and SIL
Explore further