Screener
CQQQ vs IGM
Invesco China Technology ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.26% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than CQQQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CQQQ covers emerging markets markets; IGM covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $9.5B |
| Since | 2009 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +59.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | +21.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 1.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and IGM
Explore further