Screener
CQQQ vs IGV
Invesco China Technology ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGV costs 0.26% less per year.
- IGV is significantly larger than CQQQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CQQQ covers emerging markets markets; IGV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IGV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | IGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $12.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | -8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | 25.67% |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -45.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and IGV
Explore further