Screener
CQQQ vs IXN
Invesco China Technology ETF vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.26% less per year.
- CQQQ covers emerging markets markets; IXN covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $7.8B |
| Since | 2009 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +70.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +35.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | +22.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | 21.79% |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -36.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and IXN
Explore further