Screener
CRBN vs SUSA
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF vs iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
Key differences
- SUSA is significantly larger than CRBN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUSA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRBN | SUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $3.8B |
| Since | 2014 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.4% | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.09% | 12.47% |
| Max drawdown | -33.13% | -32.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRBN and SUSA
Explore further