Screener
CRBN vs USXF
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF
Key differences
- USXF costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, USXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CRBN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRBN | USXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +33.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.4% | +15.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.09% | 16.12% |
| Max drawdown | -33.13% | -29.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRBN and USXF
Explore further