Screener
CRUX vs CANQ
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF
Key differences
Both CRUX and CANQ are fixed income ETFs. CRUX charges 0.32% a year and CANQ 0.94%. The main difference: CRUX follows a active selection strategy; CANQ uses option income.
- CRUX follows a active selection strategy; CANQ uses option income.
- CRUX costs 0.62% less per year.
- CRUX is much larger than CANQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRUX | CANQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.94% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $25M |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 4.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.27% |
| Max drawdown | -1.86% | -12.79% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.