Screener
CRUX vs EQIN
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- CRUX is significantly larger than EQIN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRUX is classified as fixed income, while EQIN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CRUX follows a active selection strategy; EQIN uses index tracking.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRUX | EQIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $276M |
| Since | 2009 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.00% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.39% |
| Max drawdown | -1.86% | -42.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRUX and EQIN
Explore further