Screener
CRUX vs SCCR
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Schwab Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCCR costs 0.16% less per year.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRUX | SCCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.00% | 4.47% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.84% |
| Max drawdown | -1.86% | -2.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRUX and SCCR
Explore further