Screener
CSM vs CCOR
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- CSM costs 0.84% less per year.
- CSM is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSM follows a long short strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, CSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSM | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $499M | $28M |
| Since | 2009 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -36.11% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSM and CCOR
Explore further