Screener
CSMD vs FAD
Congress SMID Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FAD costs 0.05% less per year.
- CSMD follows a active selection strategy; FAD uses index tracking.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSMD | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $433M | $480M |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.9% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.93% | 18.41% |
| Max drawdown | -22.54% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSMD and FAD
Explore further