Screener
CTA vs MATE
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
- CTA costs 0.22% less per year.
- CTA is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CTA follows a systematic alpha strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTA | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $37M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.03% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.07% | -13.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTA and MATE
Explore further