Screener
MATE vs FFUT
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
Key differences
- FFUT costs 0.17% less per year.
- FFUT is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; FFUT uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | FFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $256M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -2.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and FFUT
Explore further