Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CTA vs PIT

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

CTA

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Simplify Asset Management

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$1.7B

PIT

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$240M

Key differences

  • PIT costs 0.20% less per year.
  • CTA is significantly larger than PIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • CTA is classified as alternative, while PIT is commodity — different risk/return profiles.
  • Over the last 3 years, PIT has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

CTAPIT
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.55%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$240M
Since20222022
Dividend yield4.03%6.17%
Asset classalternativecommodity
Region
Strategysystematic alpha
CAGR 1Y+12.0%+58.8%
CAGR 3Y+11.5%+23.1%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.551.07
Volatility 1Y19.97%21.44%
Max drawdown-18.07%-12.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to CTA and PIT