Screener
CTEC vs FFND
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.50% less per year.
- FFND is significantly larger than CTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CTEC follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEC | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $99M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +124.6% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.99% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -81.58% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEC and FFND
Explore further