Screener
CTEC vs RIFR
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.09% less per year.
- CTEC follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- CTEC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEC | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $42M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +131.2% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.90% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -81.58% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEC and RIFR
Explore further