Screener
RIFR vs IPAV
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
Key differences
- RIFR is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; IPAV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | IPAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $5M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | 16.97% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -14.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and IPAV
Explore further