Screener
CTEX vs AQWA
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.08% less per year.
- AQWA is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CTEX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEX | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $26M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +156.4% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.38% | 14.42% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEX and AQWA
Explore further