Screener
CTEX vs ICLN
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.19% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CTEX covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, CTEX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +156.4% | +87.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.38% | 25.93% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEX and ICLN
Explore further