Screener
CVGD vs EFAS
CresAlta Global Dividend ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- CVGD follows a active selection strategy; EFAS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CVGD | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $48M |
| Since | — | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | — | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CVGD and EFAS
Explore further