Screener
CVY vs HIMU
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- HIMU costs 0.82% less per year.
- HIMU is significantly larger than CVY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CVY is classified as mixed asset, while HIMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CVY covers global markets; HIMU covers north america.
- CVY follows a active selection strategy; HIMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CVY | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.74% | 5.16% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.04% | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -50.47% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CVY and HIMU
Explore further