Screener
CWS vs SMH
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
Both CWS and SMH are equity ETFs. CWS charges 0.65% a year and SMH 0.35%. The main difference: CWS follows a active selection strategy; SMH uses index tracking.
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; SMH uses index tracking.
- SMH costs 0.30% less per year.
- SMH is much larger than CWS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $67.8B |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.9% | +137.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +63.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | +38.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 33.20% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -45.30% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.