Screener
CZA vs EQWL
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
Both CZA and EQWL are equity ETFs. CZA charges 0.69% a year and EQWL 0.25%. The main difference: EQWL costs 0.44% less per year.
- EQWL costs 0.44% less per year.
- EQWL is much larger than CZA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 10.56% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -34.30% |
Similar to CZA and EQWL
Explore further