Screener
CZA vs RSP
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.49% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZA follows a index tracking strategy; RSP uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, RSP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | RSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $89.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 11.65% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -39.04% |
Similar to CZA and RSP
Explore further