Screener
CZA vs IMCB
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IMCB costs 0.65% less per year.
- IMCB is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IMCB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 12.96% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -40.99% |
Similar to CZA and IMCB
Explore further