Screener
CZA vs IWR
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.51% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $54.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 13.54% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -40.59% |
Similar to CZA and IWR
Explore further