Screener
CZA vs IWS
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- IWS costs 0.46% less per year.
- IWS is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $15.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -43.83% |
Similar to CZA and IWS
Explore further